Whether in the education of children or when working for better job conditions or in the global political conflicts: I liked to stand for consequence. But sometimes, if you insist too much, the criticized and rejected people react very vehemently and forget to stay cool, the escalation becomes a clear problem. Permanent consequence as strategy mostly will produce many significant collateral damages.
title=”Egypt Revolution” – photo by dimios_, kindly sent to my group BLOG IT!, click on the picture to enter his galleries on Flickr.com
My guitar instrumental: a tribute to the peace movement of the sixties (Buffy Sainte-Marie, Donovan, Joan Baez, Bob Dylan etc., they changed nothing, conflicts seem to be a constant part of human nature, at least of social networks…)
Flickr Comments 
I chose different pictures for the same subject….And you’ll be probably interested by my post of 4:00 PM on politics….
Why the Pro-morsi don’t want to go to new elections ? They are the leading force in Egypt…. Strange ??? or not.
LikeLike
the conflicts will go on – everywhere and anytime, it seems to be an everlasting fragment of social networks …
LikeLike
I saw a film about the Palestinian/Israeli troubles last night, where the people did stay cool and peaceful but still were harassed, had their land stolen, were shot and killed despite being unarmed … great film called Five Broken Cameras.
LikeLike
the Palestinian/Israeli troubles are a constant part of yearly news = notnews. Similar structures sometimes can be observed between children and parents, factory owners and working class heroes – only the methods and tools of resistance change, but the basic is always the same: psychological structures, a hate state of mind …
LikeLike
There is something depressingly inevitable about human conflict. Change will always cause pain and upheaval, as it is sought by some and resisted by others. This pull in two ways leads to tension, and usually violence. Almost every country which likes to call itself free now had a civil war before the new structure of cooperation was found.
LikeLike
that’s exactly what I wrote here :
LikeLike
dear Seonaid, you wrote “Almost every country which likes to call itself free now had a civil war before the new structure of cooperation was found…” – and I say NO! What about Norway, Sweden, Denmark – it must be necessary, to construct freedom patiently by making laws better step by step – with patience, humor, flexibility, leaving the idea of consequence sometimes, ready to compromise: a good rule for education, guarding dignity of working class heroes and nations: for all three structures first rule: to avoid a hate state of mind …
LikeLike
You’re right but those democracy had dark hours too during World War and before, when they were free. Their freedom is sometimes consequences of wars
LikeLike
Well I did include the word almost Frizz:-)
I love your utopian dream. The countries you list are exceptions to the rule, but you only need to look out across the rest of Europe and America to find the rule applied.
LikeLike
accept bloodshed, only because the crowd (badly educated, framed by oppressed journalists) is too silly, to organize a better law system?
LikeLike
Complicated subject. It seems more about a fight for religion than democracy. A lot of hate brewing.
LikeLike
my favorite philosopher, Immanuel Kant:
– he wrote: “A religion, which makes humans dark, is wrong…”
LikeLike
I’m with the Sundog….
LikeLike
maybe it is a gender fight camouflaged as a religious battle; but the religions are systems, which oppress women …
LikeLike
Historically, politics used religion for fight, people believed they fought for their God. They still believe if they fight for God, then God will protect them…
LikeLike
“There are many mistakes
one can make
along the road to truth…”
– Frizz version of a Buddha quote…
LikeLike
it’s always great to come along ‘later’ and read the feedback! nice post and nice tune! thanks!
LikeLike
Whoa! This photo speaks volumes. Hey, I loved the guitar work!
LikeLike